Lei Feng Network (search "Lei Feng Network" public concern) : Author of this article Zhu Yulong, automotive industry engineers. The content shared by the headmaster Zhu is in the industry. If you are interested in cars, you can look at his special topic: “New Driving Says: Autopilots Those Things | Zhu Yulong†.
Google is a great and ambitious company. The successes and failures of projects have been made. From the start of 2009 on autopilot projects to the time it takes for the allocation of people to go, it is unclear what the problems are. We want to go through some logical discussions. -
The personnel changes in this project of Google
What does Google get from Autonomous vehicle?
How will Google do this business in the future?
The fade-out of Sebastian Thrun and the first wave of the team, and more of the entire project began to shift from research to engineering, and the work of Chris Urmson later brought the project of Google autonomous ehicle to the front desk.
Interested can look at the team composition .
Anthony Levandowski, an engineer and a team of engineers came out and it was interesting to do Otto, on the one hand, the problem of directional choice, the second is also thinking about the difference between passenger car autopilot and commercial vehicles, is a commercial vehicle faster Some passenger cars that are related to the safety of ordinary people are faster.
Chris Urmson's symbolism is too great, especially to see clearly Google's differences in the entire project , the CEO of the car company, Urmson, who has been committed to the auto driving business, and Google's boss, the direction of the three projects on the entire project. On the game.
The iron-plated soldiers in the camps and the stable career are in no position to play. But considering the current state of development in autopilot, there are several considerations:
Google's pace for the future is not to make everyone agree.
The investment needs of capital for autonomous driving systems have prompted this division to begin to differentiate.
| Google’s gains and lossesGoogle's reputation in the hardware business and its software are still very different. Let’s take a look at Google’s gains and losses on Autonomous vehicles.
Google takes the leading edge in advancing the entire Autonomous vehicle
Google = "Map Acquisition Vehicle =" Accumulated Real Map Acquisition Gained a lot of map data
Google has accumulated a lot of test data
Google has accumulated a large number of software engineers
Google consumes some money and cannot see a return in the short term
Google has adopted a L3/L4 system architecture based on DARPA
At least for now, this cause will not be a loss.
Remarks: In principle, the following auto-piloted vehicles are really divided into those requiring human intervention and not requiring any human intervention. Therefore, in the auto-piloting road test at the L3 or higher level, these are considered to be meaningful.
In fact, the context of this matter, we look again:
Previous planning
From this figure, we can also see the characteristics of what the Google Car team did before.
Maintain strong independence
Tested RX450h SUV actually does not need car companies to intervene
The Prototype vehicle was built directly by a group of small partners.
Full use of data collection, testing, and software company features
Step by step, rapid iteration
Through practical work and exploration, it avoids the traditional perception of the original car companies.
Use the experience of the previous game for reference to optimize
The problem here is certainly more obvious:
Obvious and traditional automotive OEMs have a huge cognitive gap
In simple terms, it is considered that the work and awareness of car companies in autopilot is less important
In road safety management, there is also a difference in knowledge about the vehicle's self-driving QRD, and there is a different understanding of the safety of the entire system.
Different maturity and commercial perception of the entire autopilot system
John Krafcik
The gentleman came from the Previous Position: President and CEO, Hyundai Motor America, and its style looks from below -
The Google autonomous test fleet would be more than doubled with the addition of 100 new 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid minivans, with the companies aiming to have some on the road by the end of this year.
The collaboration with FCA marks the first time that google has worked directly with an automaker to build self-driving vehicles.
FCA will design the minivans so it's easy for us to install our self-driving systems, including the computers that hold our self-driving software, and the sensors that enable our software to see what's on the road around the vehicle,"
Simply put, after leading the recognition and investment of auto companies in this autonomous vehicle industry, Google merged with auto companies. After becoming a pioneer, it began to further cooperate with auto companies:
Changed from production to production in the beginning of design and manufacture
The entire process is negotiated and discussed by Google and OEM engineers
The good one is: Considering two aspects more deeply
What is debatable is that the entire rhythm cannot be at least according to the original rhythm. The development and demonstration of car enterprises and verification methods are at least the same.
The bad thing is that cognitive conflicts have begun to increase with the impact of the original developers.
Internet companies and car companies communicate, just like Car play and google auto. After all, they cannot follow their own temperament.
In the end, it is related to consumers. The former has a larger impact factor.
Basic driving related, car prices more power
Autopilot system? I don't know who’s right to speak at this time and it’s not clear
We can understand Urmson's departure, but also understand that important software engineers leave. Then there will be more engineers to accept the challenge. This only shows that change is always present. Whether it is the engineers of the Internet or the engineers we make as cars, the only thing that remains unchanged is that the technology is bringing with it new changes, leading to changes in the preferences of consumers and also stimulating changes in the system.
PS: There are a lot of Chinese companies in California, and Baidu LeTV is waiting for a delivery. SAIC and BAIC are also there.
Summary: Say a lot, this week will focus on these really running cars to look at their situation to explore the same and different things.
Lei Feng Net Note: Reproduced, please contact the authorization, and retain the source and the author, not to delete the content.
LED Sofa Feature:
1. Polyethylene (PE) is a kind of thermoplastic material, not easy to broken, suitable for long time delivery
2. Non toxic, safe for human healthy
3. Rechargeable battery and remote control
4. Multi-colors change & color selection
5. Anti UV & waterproof
6. Adopt the EPISTAR led chip to ensure the color quality and life time
7. Certificate: CE, ROHS, etc
8. Warranty: 1 year
Bar, nightclub, golf club, disco, KTV, bistro, patio, pub, hotel, restaurant, cafe, coffee shop, tea house, plaza, garden, entertainment park, amusement park, home, villa, swimming pool, wedding, party, events, decoration, design, project, rental/hire.
Led Sofa,Led Waterproof Sofa,Led Outdoor Sofa,Led Color Changing Sofa,Led Bar Sofa,RGB Color Light Sofa
KIWA ELECTRONIC (HK) INDUSTRIES CO.,LTD , https://www.kiwahk.com